<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<user>
  <id type="integer">198684</id>
  <url>http://uservoice.com/users/198684-lifelocksmith</url>
  <avatar_url>http://www.gravatar.com/avatar/9aabd8863ffa0b16703f858acb287e14?default=http://uservoice.com/images/icons/default-avatar.jpg</avatar_url>
  <display_name>LifeLocksmith</display_name>
  <name deprecated="true">LifeLocksmith</name>
  <username deprecated="true">LifeLocksmith</username>
  <activity_score type="integer">0</activity_score>
  <idea_score type="integer">0</idea_score>
  <supported_suggestions type="array" deprecated="false">
<suggestion>
  <id type="integer">97856</id>
  <url>http://lookpicking.uservoice.com/pages/6371-general/suggestions/97856-support-foriegn-language-letters-in-search-term</url>
  <title>Support foriegn language letters in search term</title>
  <abstract>Currently when entering a search term in a foriegn lanuage (I am using Hebrew), the actual search site (google for example) is recieving a messed-up string of garbled characters.</abstract>
  <text>Currently when entering a search term in a foriegn lanuage (I am using Hebrew), the actual search site (google for example) is recieving a messed-up string of garbled characters.</text>
  <closed_at nil="true"></closed_at>
  <vote_count type="integer">3</vote_count>
  <comments_count type="integer">3</comments_count>
  <status>under review</status>
  <forum>
    <id type="integer">6371</id>
    <name>General</name>
    <key deprecated="true">general</key>
  </forum>
  <response>
    <text>Hi, I am having difficulties to reproduce this. Could you let me know some details of your setup? (LIke Firefox version, add-on-version, operating system, specific search engine that is not working [f.i., the Google web search works fine for me when I enter a string like '&#1506;&#1460;&#1489;&#1456;&#1512;&#1460;&#1497;&#1514;'] Are you searching from the add-on or from one of the search fields on the web site?)</text>
    <abstract>Hi, I am having difficulties to reproduce this. Could you let me know some details of your setup? (LIke Firefox version, add-on-version, operating...</abstract>
    <user>
      <id type="integer">139270</id>
      <name>unsyn</name>
      <display_name>unsyn</display_name>
    </user>
  </response>
  <created_by>
    <supporter>
      <user>
        <id type="integer">198684</id>
        <display_name>LifeLocksmith</display_name>
        <name deprecated="true">LifeLocksmith</name>
        <username deprecated="true">LifeLocksmith</username>
      </user>
    </supporter>
  </created_by>
  <created_at type="datetime">2009-01-04T09:08:01Z</created_at>
  <updated_at type="datetime">2009-01-04T14:53:49Z</updated_at>
  <page deprecated="true">
    <key>general</key>
  </page>
</suggestion>
<suggestion>
  <id type="integer">100789</id>
  <url>http://lookpicking.uservoice.com/pages/6371-general/suggestions/100789-in-page-searching</url>
  <title>In-page searching</title>
  <abstract>Find search terms in current
Instead of opening the find toolbar (Ctrl-F) and entering the word to search for (which are already in the search bar), just use the search term which is already...</abstract>
  <text>Find search terms in current page.
Instead of opening the find toolbar (Ctrl-F) and entering the word to search for (which are already in the search bar), just use the search term which is already there.

Possible ways to use the serch terms:
1.make the terms clickable (like SearchWP)
2.copy the search term to the find toolbard - less elegant, but good.
3. Make the lookpicks search bar interact with other plugin the same way the searchbox works.</text>
  <closed_at nil="true"></closed_at>
  <vote_count type="integer">3</vote_count>
  <comments_count type="integer">2</comments_count>
  <status>started</status>
  <forum>
    <id type="integer">6371</id>
    <name>General</name>
    <key deprecated="true">general</key>
  </forum>
  <response>
    <text>I have to admit that SearchWP is nice. It would be hard to make it interact with lookpick though, f.i. because lookpick uses the search box not only for search terms, but also to display search engine names along with search terms. I would probably have to add that functionality myself. What do you think about this instead: Hit something like ctrl+return to search inside the page using the phrase in the search box? (or hand the phrase over to the in-page search at the bottom) I have no idea how hard that would be, it is not top priority but I'll check and if it's not too hard I'll add it. I'll get back on this as soon as I get around to looking at it.

*EDIT*
Alright, the newest version of lookpick ( http://lookpicking.com/firefox/lookpick.xpi ) now allows for rudimentary in-page searching. When you hit ctrl-return, the query gets copied from the searchbox to the in-page find bar, bringing it up if necessary. There, you can edit it if you want, and then hit return to search the web page (or you may hit ctrl-return again to highlight all occurences).</text>
    <abstract>I have to admit that SearchWP is nice. It would be hard to make it interact with lookpick though, f.i. because lookpick uses the search box not only...</abstract>
    <user>
      <id type="integer">139270</id>
      <name>unsyn</name>
      <display_name>unsyn</display_name>
    </user>
  </response>
  <created_by>
    <supporter>
      <user>
        <id type="integer">198684</id>
        <display_name>LifeLocksmith</display_name>
        <name deprecated="true">LifeLocksmith</name>
        <username deprecated="true">LifeLocksmith</username>
      </user>
    </supporter>
  </created_by>
  <created_at type="datetime">2009-01-09T10:06:42Z</created_at>
  <updated_at type="datetime">2009-01-30T02:11:52Z</updated_at>
  <page deprecated="true">
    <key>general</key>
  </page>
</suggestion>
<suggestion>
  <id type="integer">100794</id>
  <url>http://lookpicking.uservoice.com/pages/6371-general/suggestions/100794-sync-search-term-with-values-in-current-page</url>
  <title>Sync search term with values in current page</title>
  <abstract>When the current search term changes in the web 
page, change it also in the lookpicks search box.

Just like SearchBox Sync add-on.</abstract>
  <text>When the current search term changes in the web 
page, change it also in the lookpicks search box.

Just like SearchBox Sync add-on.</text>
  <closed_at nil="true"></closed_at>
  <vote_count type="integer">2</vote_count>
  <comments_count type="integer">1</comments_count>
  <status>planned</status>
  <forum>
    <id type="integer">6371</id>
    <name>General</name>
    <key deprecated="true">general</key>
  </forum>
  <response>
    <text>Ok, this requires more than a quick fix on my part. I will address it with the next release if feasible (from what I have seen so far, I think it is). Until then, I have patched the SearchBoxSync add-on so that it works with the newest version of lookpick (http://lookpicking.com/firefox/lookpick.xpi ). Download the patched SearchboxSync here: http://lookpicking.com/stuff/searchbox_sync-1.3b1_patched_for_lookpicking-fx.xpi (save it to your computer and then drag it onto a Firefox window). It will work with lookpick installed and without lookpick. However, it will not work when lookpick is installed and switched to 'standard search' mode.</text>
    <abstract>Ok, this requires more than a quick fix on my part. I will address it with the next release if feasible (from what I have seen so far, I think it is). ...</abstract>
    <user>
      <id type="integer">139270</id>
      <name>unsyn</name>
      <display_name>unsyn</display_name>
    </user>
  </response>
  <created_by>
    <supporter>
      <user>
        <id type="integer">198684</id>
        <display_name>LifeLocksmith</display_name>
        <name deprecated="true">LifeLocksmith</name>
        <username deprecated="true">LifeLocksmith</username>
      </user>
    </supporter>
  </created_by>
  <created_at type="datetime">2009-01-09T10:17:18Z</created_at>
  <updated_at type="datetime">2009-01-10T14:06:55Z</updated_at>
  <page deprecated="true">
    <key>general</key>
  </page>
</suggestion>
  </supported_suggestions>
  <created_at type="datetime">2009-01-04T09:06:43Z</created_at>
  <updated_at type="datetime">2009-02-17T04:27:55Z</updated_at>
</user>
